Compared to the world language, the necessity of a world script is much less, while a world dress is not necessary at all. Why only a world dress? In my opinion even the national dress of different countries is not desirable.
People select their dress in accordance with the local climate and environment, depending upon their physical needs and professional requirements, hence it is better not to criticize anyone's dress. For example, the normal dress in eastern India and East Pakistan [Bangladesh] is lungi, dhoti [men's lower-body garments] and punjabi [a style of men's shirt], but men wear trousers, as required, while working in factories. Likewise, in north-western India and West Pakistan [Pakistan], while the traditional dress is pa'yja'ma' [loose-fitting pants] and sheroya'nii [another style of men's shirt], peasants never wear this dress while ploughing the fields. Under such circumstances, the question whether one dress is good and another is bad does not arise. [PROBLEMS OF THE DAY - 22]
The forward march of human beings requires an internal approach and an adjustment with external objectivities. That is, it requires an internal, spiritual approach, as well as an external approach which maintains balance, equilibrium and equipoise in the different arenas of our social, economic and cultural life.
'You go, Muslim girls," I thought, sitting in a Muslim prayer service in New York City last week, the first public observance of the traditional Friday call to prayer that's ever been led by women.
Heathrow Airport is being targeted by protesters over claims live animals are being imported for laboratory research.
TRIPOLI (
The more the human mind becomes magnanimous or expanded, the more it rises above the sentiments of tribalism, communalism [socio-religious sentiment], provincialism, etc. Often I hear people say that nationalism is an appreciable sentiment and that there is no narrowness in it. 



