The last two weeks there has been an uproar over who manages our ports. The uproar began when it became public that the British company Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., who manages terminal at 6 US ports was being bought out by Dubai Ports World. DPW is owned by Dubai which is one of the 7 Emirates of the United Arab Emirates. Since then there has been many statement made that have no bearing in fact. Any debate needs to be based on facts and not fear and political posturing. While I believe that no port operations should be managed by companies from out side the United States, I do not agree with using false information to promote that position.
Fact 1. DPW is not buying 6 American ports. All ports in the United States are owned by the states they are located in. In fact no part of the ports are owned by companies inside or outside the US. That said there are terminals, warehouses and other facilities that are leased to companies both inside and outside the US. DPW is buying P&O P&O which runs shipping terminals in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
Fact 2. None of our ports are managed by companies inside or outside the US. Our ports are run by government bodies called Port Authorities . Many local Port Authorities contract out the management of individual terminals inside the port. Many times these terminals are leased to the company that manages them.
Fact 3. There are companies in America that can manage operations at our ports. I have seen several articles and many postings in blogs that say that our port operations are managed by foreign companies because there are no companies in America that do that kind of job. The truth is that two of the 10 largest port management companies are located here in the US.
Fact 4. The U.S. Coast Guard, Customs, port police and the Department of Homeland Security for all terminal operators. The operators themselves are not responsible for security. That being said there is a lot of information about how our ports are operated and possible vulnerabilities in the hands of companies out side our country.
Does facts 1, 2, and 4 mean that we should allow foreign companies to manage operations at our ports? I do not think so. It is one thing for a private company to out source jobs out side the US and another for our government to do so. If you look at the approval numbers for the President and the Congress you see that 65% to 70% of the people are not happy with the quality of jobs they are doing. We would all agree that it would be wrong to out source these positions to people in other countries who might do the job cheaper. Below are the top 4 reasons I thing we should not allow out sourcing the operations of our ports to companies out side the US.
If you are interested in signing the petition to ask our elected officials to require the management of the operations of our ports to be by companies located here in the US then visit this site. http://common-sense-america.com/port-petition.htm
-----------------------------
Rusty Ford is the president of American Common Sense.
-----------------------------
Direct URL to Article:
http://www.easyarticles.com/article.php?action=fullnews&id=2587
|
"In economic life there is extreme inequality and exploitation. Although colonialism no longer exists openly in the political and economic sphere, still it persists indirectly, and this should not be tolerated... In this respect you should remember that in economic life, we will have to guarantee the minimum requirements of life to one and all... There cannot be any sort of adjustment as far as this point is concerned. The minimum purchasing requirement must be guaranteed to all. Today these fundamental essentialities are not being guaranteed. Rather, people are being guided by deceptive economic ideas like outdated Marxism, which has proven ineffective in practical life and has not been successfully implemented in any corner of the world. Why do people still believe in such a theory, which has never been proved successful? The time has come for people to make a proper assessment of whether they are being misguided or not." |
|
"Human beings have still not been able to form a human society, and have still not learned to move with the spirit of a pilgrim. Although many small groups, motivated by self-interest, work together in particular situations, not even a small fraction of their work is done with a broader social motive. By strict definition, shall we have to declare that each small family unit is a society in itself? If going ahead in mutual adjustment only out of narrow self-interest or momentary self-seeking is called society, then in such a society, no provision can be made for the disabled, the diseased or the helpless, because in most cases nobody can benefit from them in any way... in that case there always remains the possibility of some people getting isolated from the collective. All human beings must attach themselves to others by the common bond of love and march forward hand in hand; then only will I proclaim it a society." |