"Eliminating hunger and making sure all Brazilians are able to eat three square meals a day was one of Lula's main campaign pledges in 2002."
(IPS) - This decade will be marked by the reduction of inequality in Brazil, just as the 1990s brought currency stability and the universalisation of primary education, according to Marcelo Neri, the head of the Getulio Vargas Foundation's Centre for Social Policies.
Brazil has the most unequal distribution of income in Latin America, which is the most unequal region in the world.
But economic inequality in Brazil has been diminishing at a fast pace since 2001, with the per capita income of the poor growing "at a Chinese-style rate," which is expected to continue this year, Neri told IPS.
Full story: http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33655
Posted by proutist-universal on June 22, 2006 1:39 AM | TrackBack
|
"In economic life there is extreme inequality and exploitation. Although colonialism no longer exists openly in the political and economic sphere, still it persists indirectly, and this should not be tolerated... In this respect you should remember that in economic life, we will have to guarantee the minimum requirements of life to one and all... There cannot be any sort of adjustment as far as this point is concerned. The minimum purchasing requirement must be guaranteed to all. Today these fundamental essentialities are not being guaranteed. Rather, people are being guided by deceptive economic ideas like outdated Marxism, which has proven ineffective in practical life and has not been successfully implemented in any corner of the world. Why do people still believe in such a theory, which has never been proved successful? The time has come for people to make a proper assessment of whether they are being misguided or not." |
|
"Human beings have still not been able to form a human society, and have still not learned to move with the spirit of a pilgrim. Although many small groups, motivated by self-interest, work together in particular situations, not even a small fraction of their work is done with a broader social motive. By strict definition, shall we have to declare that each small family unit is a society in itself? If going ahead in mutual adjustment only out of narrow self-interest or momentary self-seeking is called society, then in such a society, no provision can be made for the disabled, the diseased or the helpless, because in most cases nobody can benefit from them in any way... in that case there always remains the possibility of some people getting isolated from the collective. All human beings must attach themselves to others by the common bond of love and march forward hand in hand; then only will I proclaim it a society." |